prof.dr. M.H. (Marius) van Dijke

Academic (87)

• van Dijke, M., Guo, Y., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2024). Perceived Organizational Change Strengthens Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior via Increased Organizational Nostalgia. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001221

• Leunissen, J. M., van Dijke, M., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2024). Organizational Nostalgia: The Construct, the Scale and its Implications for Organizational Functioning. British Journal of Management, 35(2), 816-838. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12740

• Versteegt, L., van Dijke, M., & van den Bos, K. (2024). Physical distancing during the COVID-19 crisis: The roles of threat and moralization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 54(3), 162-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13021

• Brockner, J., & van Dijke, M. (2024). Work engagement and burnout in anticipation of physically returning to work: The interactive effect of imminence of return and self-affirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, Article 104527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104527

• van Houwelingen, G., & van Dijke, M. (2023). Investing to gain others’ trust: Cognitive abstraction increases prosocial behavior and trust received from others. PLoS ONE, 18(4 April), Article e0284500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284500

• van Dijke, M., & Leunissen, J. M. (2023). Nostalgia in organizations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 49, Article 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101540

• Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., De Schutter, L., van Dijke, M., Young, H. R., Lee, H. W., Johnson, R., & Chiang, J. T.-J. (2022). The impact of leader depletion on leader performance: the mediating role of leaders' trust beliefs and employees' citizenship behaviors. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 20676. Article 20676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24882-3

• Versteegt, L., van Dijke, M., van Ruysseveldt, J., & van den Bos, K. (2022). When Employees Experience Low Levels of Job Autonomy, Fair Procedures Buffer Unfair Outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 784853. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784853

• van Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., Hoogervorst, N., Meijs, L., & De Cremer, D. (2022). Two Sides of the Same Coin: Punishment and Forgiveness in Organizational Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 908021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908021

• van Quaquebeke, N., Salem, M., van Dijke, M., & Wenzel, R. (2022). Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(3), 268-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221097571

• Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., Hirst, G., De Schutter, L., Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2022). The Effect of Decisional Leader Procrastination on Employee Innovation: Investigating the Moderating Role of Employees’ Resistance to Change. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 29(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211044166

• Giurge, L.-M., Dijke, M., Zheng, X., & De Cremer, D. (2021). Does Power Corrupt the Mind? The Influence of Power on Moral Reasoning and Self-Interested Behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.03.003

• Brockner, J., De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., De Schutter, L., Holtz, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2021). Factors affecting supervisors' enactment of interpersonal fairness: The interactive relationship between their managers' informational fairness and supervisors' sense of power. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(6), 800-813. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2466

• Houwelingen, G., Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., & Van Hiel, A. (2021). Cognitive Foundations of Impartial Punitive Decision Making in Organizations: Attribution and Abstraction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2480

• Zheng, M. X., Schuh, S. C., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2021). Procedural justice enactment as an instrument of position protection: The three-way interaction between leaders' power position stability, followers' warmth, and followers' competence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(6), 785-799. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2493

• van Dijke, M., Van Quaquebeke, N., & Brockner, J. (2020). In Self-Defense: Reappraisal Buffers the Negative Impact of Low Procedural Fairness on Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, 26(4), 739-754. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000303

• Reinders Folmer, C. P., De Cremer, D., Wubben, M., & van Dijke, M. (2020). We can’t go on together with suspicious minds: Forecasting errors in evaluating the appreciation of denials. Journal of Trust Research, 10(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2020.1738944

• Dijke, M. (2020). Power and leadership. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.012

• Sheppard, L., O'Reilly, J., Dijke, M., Restubog, S., & Aquino, K. (2020). The Stress-Relieving Benefits of Positively-Experienced Social Sexual Behavior in the Workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.09.002

• Zheng, X., & Dijke, M. (2020). Expressing Forgiveness after Interpersonal Mistreatment: Power and Status of Forgivers Influence Transgressors’ Relationship Restoration Efforts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(8), 782-796. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2432

• Dijke, M., Leunissen, JM., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2019). Nostalgia Promotes Intrinsic Motivation and Effort in the Presence of Low Interactional Justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.003

• Dijke, M., Gobena, L., & Verboon, P. (2019). Make me want to pay! A three-way interaction between procedural justice, distributive justice, and power on voluntary tax compliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632

• De Cremer, D., Dijke, M., Schminke, M., De Schutter, L., & Stouten, J. (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1335-1357. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000339

• Zheng, X., Yuan, Y., Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., & Van Hiel, A. (2018). The Interactive Effect of a Leader’s Sense of Uniqueness and Sense of Belongingness on Followers’ Perceptions of Leader Authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 515-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4070-4

• Houwelingen, G., Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Trust maintenance as a function of construal level and attributions: the case of apologies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2291

• van Dijke, M., van Houwelingen, G., De Cremer, D., & De Schutter, L. (2018). So Gross and Yet so Far Away: Psychological Distance Moderates the Effect of Disgust on Moral Judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 689-701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722198, https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722198

• Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Langendijk, G., & Anderson, C. (2018). Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(2), 164-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000260

• Zheng, X., Dijke, M., Narayanan, J., & De Cremer, D. (2017). When expressing forgiveness backfires in the workplace: Victim power moderates the effect of expressing forgiveness on transgressor compliance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1392940

• Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2017). Fairness Enactment as Response to Higher Level Unfairness. The Roles of Self-Construal and Spatial Distance. Journal of Management, 43(2), 319-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314530166

• Gobena, L. B., & van Dijke, M. (2017). Fear and caring: Procedural justice, trust, and collective identification as antecedents of voluntary tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62(October), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.005

• Zheng, X., van Dijke, M., Leunissen, J. M., Giurge, L.-M., & De Cremer, D. (2016). When saying sorry may not help: Transgressor power moderates the effect of an apology on forgiveness in the workplace. Human Relations, 69(6), 1387-1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715611236

• Gobena, L. B., & van Dijke, M. (2016). Power, justice, and trust: A moderated mediation analysis of voluntary tax compliance among Ethiopian small business owners. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52(February), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.004

• Desmet, P., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijke, M. (2015). Prophets vs. profits: How market competition influences leaders' disciplining behavior towards ethical transgressions. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1034-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.004

• van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Brebels, LGG., & van Quaquebeke, N. (2015). Willing and Able: Action-State Orientation and the relation between Procedural Justice and Employee Cooperation. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1982-2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478187

• van Gils, S., van Quaquebeke, N., van Knippenberg, D., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.08.005

• Bianchi, E., Brockner, J., van den Bos, K., Seifert, M., Moon, H., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome favorability and procedural fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214556237

• van Dijke, M., Wildschut, T., Leunissen, J. M., & Sedikides, C. (2015). Nostalgia Buffers the Negative Impact of Low Procedural Justice on Cooperation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127(March), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.005

• Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Out of control!? How loss of self-control influences prosocial behavior: the role of power and moral values. PLoS One (online), 10(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126377

• Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers' moral transgressions are determined by leader's construal level mindset. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 878-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.007

• Brebels, LGG., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2014). Using self-definition to predict the influence of procedural justice on organizational, interpersonal, and task-oriented citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 40(3), 731-763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410605

• Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Being `in Control' May Make You Lose control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2

• Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Feel good, do-good!? On consistency and compensation in moral self-regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1794-z

• Leunissen, JM., De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Reinders Folmer, C. (2014). Forecasting Errors in the Averseness of an Apology. Social Justice Research, 27(3), 322-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0216-4

• Desmet, P., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijke, M. (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition Influences Leader's Disciplining Behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), Article 15818. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2014.119

• Leunissen, JM., De Cremer, D., Reinders Folmer, C., & van Dijke, M. (2013). The Apology Mismatch: Asymmetries Between Victim's Need for Apologies and Perpetrator's. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.005

• Cramwinckel, FM., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! How the touching of dirty objects leads to higher rewards for unethical followers. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1385-4

• Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2013). When do Leaders Grant Voice? How Leaders' Perceptions of Followers' Control and Belongingness Needs Affect the Enactment of Fair Procedures. Human Relations, 66(7), 973-992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713482150

• Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., Mayer, D., De Cremer, D., & Euwema, M. (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 680-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.05.002

• van Ruysseveldt, J., & van Dijke, M. (2012). Wanneer bevordert en wanneer hindert werkdruk het werkplekleren? Gedrag en Organisatie, 25(1), 28-44.

• Proost, K., Van Ruysseveldt, J., & van Dijke, M. (2012). Coping with unmet expectations: Learning opportunities as a buffer against emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.526304

• Mayer, D. M., Thau, S., Workman, K. S., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Leader Mistreatment, Employee Hostility, and Deviant Behaviors: Integrating Self-Uncertainty and Thwarted Needs Perspectives on Deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003

• van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., & van Quaquebeke, N. (2012). When Does Procedural Fairness Promote Organizational Citizenship Behavior?: Integrating Empowering Leadership Types in Relational Justice Models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.006

• Geenen, B., Proost, K., Schreurs, B., van Dijke, M., Derous, E., De Witte, K., & von Grumbkow, J. (2012). The influence of general beliefs on the formation of justice expectations: The moderating role of direct experiences. Career Development International, 17(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211201337

• Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Ethical leadership. An overview and future perspecfives. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000059

• Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). When do leaders sacrifice? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 883-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.006

• Geenen, B., Proost, K., van Dijke, M., De Witte, K., & von Grumbkow, J. (2012). The role of affect in the relationship between distributive justice expectations and applicants' recommendation and litigation intentions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(4), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12003

• Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2012). The effect of perceived deterrence on compliance with authorities: The moderating influence of procedural justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.15

• Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007

• Brebels, LGG., De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. British Journal of Management, 22(SI), S47-S58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x

• Van Ruysseveldt, J., & van Dijke, M. (2011). When Are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner? The moderating role of autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 470-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.003

• van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2011). When social accounts promote acceptance of unfair ultimatum offers: The role of the victim's stress responses to uncertainty and power position. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3), 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.014

• De Cremer, D., Brockner, J., Fishman, A., van Dijke, M., van Olffen, W., & Mayer, DM. (2010). When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017866

• van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., & Mayer, D. (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 488-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018921

• van Dijke, M., & Verboon, P. (2010). Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.005

• van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004

• De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1121-1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020419

• De Cremer, D., Tenbrunsel, A., & van Dijke, M. (2010). Regulating Ethical Failures: Insights from Psychology. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(supplement 1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0789-x

• Hoogervoorst, N., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2010). Why Leaders Not Always Disapprove of Unethical Follower Behavior: It depends on the leader's self-interest and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(supplement 1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0793-1

• van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Schefferlie, P., & Bos, AER. (2009). Procedural and interpersonal fairness moderate the relationship between outcome fairness and acceptance of merit pay. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701856699

• Langendijk, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2009). How power and trust explain procedural fairness effects on self-esteem. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080134

• De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers¿ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887-899. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014782

• De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2009). On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65(4), 114-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080133

• De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., Brebels, LGG., & Hoogervorst, N. (2008). How intergroup dynamics influence within-group cooperation: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 157-175. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-48-2-3-157

• van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2008). How leader prototypicality influences followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 226-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701743491

• Van Prooijen, J. W., De Cremer, D., Van Beest, I., Stahl, T., van Dijke, M., & Van Lange, P. (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1303-1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006

• De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, AER. (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1797-1816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00238.x

• Bolman, C., Lechner, L., & van Dijke, M. (2007). Question order in the assessment of misperception of physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-4-42

• van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2007). Motivations underlying power dynamics in hierarchically structured groups. Small Group Research, 38, 643-669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407304339

• Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2007). A self-interest analysis of tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 704-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.004

• De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, AER. (2006). Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 10, 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.233

• De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, A. (2006). Leader's procedural justice affecting identification and trust. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 554-565. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730610692416

• Lechner, L., Bolman, C., & van Dijke, M. (2006). Factors related to misperception of physical activity in the Netherlands and implications for health promotion programs. Health Promotion International, 21, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dal011

• van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.351

• De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, AER. (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25(5), 466-475. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410544773

• De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, A. (2004). How Self-Relevant is Fair Treatment? Social Self-Esteem Moderates Interactional Justice Effects. Social Justice Research, 17, 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-004-2059-x

• van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2004). Social comparison of power: Interpersonal versus intergroup effects. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.13

• van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2003). Preferred changes in power differences: Effects of social comparison in equal and unequal power relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00524-3

Professional (10)

• Dijke, M. (2021). Justice enactment: why some managers treat employees fairly while others don’t. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 39. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/133347

• Dijke, M. (2021). The world after COVID-19: how we can do business better. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 39. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/133348

• Dijke, M. (2020). Employee motivation in times of organisational hardship. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 38, 22-24.

• Dijke, M. (2018). The influence of power on prosocial behaviour. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 33(1), 5-7. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/105615

• De Cremer, D., Houwelingen, G., Cornelis, I., Hoogervorst, N., Brebels, LGG., van Dijke, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2014). Are leaders fair? On the need to understand fairness management in organizations. European Business Review, July-Augus, 6-8.

• van Dijke, M., Giessner, S., van Tulder, R., & Gilbert, R. (2014). What value ethical leadership? RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 18(2), 8-11. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/77104

• van Dijke, M. (2013). A broader perspective: Harmonizing leadership activities. RSM Insight, 13(1), 16-17. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/40122

• Van Ruysseveldt, J. V. R., & van Dijke, M. (2012). Wanneer bevordert en wanneer hindert werkdruk het werkplek leren? Gedrag en Organisatie, 25, 28-44. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/38042

• De Cremer, D., Leunissen, JM., Reinders Folmer, C., & van Dijke, M. (2012). Sorry limited. Business Strategy Review, 23(3), 76-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2012.00882.x

• Zamani, K., & van Dijke, M. (2007). Virtueel Laboratorium: Onderzoeken op afstand. De Psycholoog, 42, 379-380.

Academic (1)

• Syroit, J., Derous, E., Hommes, M., Lodewijckx, H., van Dijke, M., & Poelmans, P. (2002). Interventies in groepen: conflicthantering en mediation. Open Universiteit Nederland.

Professional (1)

• van Dijke, M., Syroit, J., & Van Ruysseveldt, J. (2009). Strategisch selecteren. Noordhoff Uitgevers.

Academic (6)

• van Dijke, M. (2023). Meaning at work: Dimensions, implications, and recommendations. In J. F. Marques (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Fulfillment, Wellness, and Personal Growth at Work (pp. 33-57) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35494-6_3

• Manjunath, P., & Dijke, M. (2019). Trickle-down effects of unethical behavior: The role of meaning making. In D. Wasieleski, & J. Weber (Eds.), BAS 360 series on Business Ethics Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920190000003004

• Dijke, M., van Houwelingen, G., Hoogervorst, N., & Versteegt, L. (2018). Reflection and action: A study on moral learning consultation within Dutch prison authorities. In M. Kowalski (Ed.), Ethics of counterterrorism Boom Uitgevers.

• van Dijke, M., & de Cremer, D. (2016). Justice in the work setting. In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 315-332). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_17

• van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Justice in the work setting. In C. Sabbagh, & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research Springer-Verlag.

• De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2009). Acting fairly to be the boss: Procedural justice as a tool to affirm power relationships with subordinates. In D. Tjosvold, & B. M. van Knippenberg-Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 118-132). Cambridge University Press.

Professional (4)

• van Dijke, M., Syroit, J., & Van Ruysseveldt, J. (2009). Trends in selectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit, & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 263-276). Noordhoff Uitgevers.

• Könings, K., & van Dijke, M. (2009). Predictoren en criteria. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit, & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 59-78). Noordhoff Uitgevers.

• Proost, K., & van Dijke, M. (2009). Werving van personeel. In M. H. van Dijke, J. Syroit, & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren Noordhoff Uitgevers.

• van Dijke, M., & Proost, K. (2009). Voorselectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit, & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch selecteren (pp. 149-160). Noordhoff Uitgevers.

Popular (1)

• Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Erratum to Being "in Control" May Make You Lose Control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior (J Bus Ethics, 10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2). Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1757-4

Academic (1)

• DE SCHUTTER, L., Zheng, M. X., van Dijke, M., & Wu, W. (2023). Time Will Tell or Will it? Power Inequality Hinders Trust Meta-Accuracy Development Over Time. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2023(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.279bp

External (1)

• van Dijke, M. (2002). Understanding power dynamics. Effects of social comparison on tendencies to change power and power differences. [Doctoral Thesis, Tilburg University]. UvT.

Popular (1)

• van Dijke, M. (2014). Understanding immoral conduct in business settings. A behavioural ethics approach. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM). ERIM inaugurele reeks http://hdl.handle.net/1765/77239

Professional (1)

• Houwelingen, G., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijke, M. (2015). Reflectie en actie. Een onderzoek naar moreel leeroverleg binnen Dienst Justitiële Instellingen (DJI). [Reflection and action. A study on moral learning consultation within DJI]. Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC).

Professional (3)

• Desmet, P., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijke, M. (2015). Profits Vs Principles: Market Competition and Moral Transgression.. Web publication/site, Ideas for Leaders. https://doi.org/10.13007/380

• Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2014). How Employees Win ‘Voice’ and Influence Decisions. Web publication/site, Ideas for Leaders.

• Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., Mayer, D., De Cremer, D., & Euwema, M. (2014). Can a Leader Be Too Ethical?. Web publication/site, Ideas for Leaders.